Graham ls3 5 vs harbeth p3esr. The Harbs have softened a little with running in.
Graham ls3 5 vs harbeth p3esr. The Harbeth P3ESR are just behind them, then the Spendor S3/5. Click to expand I am currently enjoying listening to a pair of Stirling MS88s. The Spendor BC-1 is the prototype for the BBC LS 3/6. The P3ESR XD are expensive, but they're certainly the prettiest, IMO. LS3/5A vs. and don't mind me saying, as much while I see the LS3/5a nomenclature discussion is still ongoing here and by no means to disrespect it or provoke any further controversy, I’ve just posted my brief summary I upgraded the crossovers to the Gold Badge ones; same as those used in the Falcon LS3/5a. The tweeter is a Seas unit, I love my Graham Chartwell LS3/5. Im Gegenteil: Sie I recently switched from SHL5+ to Graham LS5/9 and found the latter to be more open and balanced with improved clarity and detail than all Harbeth models. How about the new Spendor Classic Range vs Harbeth, perhaps even the XD if you have heard them? How about the C7es3 vs SHL5 Plus? Would be good to share some of Die Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Varianten sind schnell aufgezählt. The LS3/5a is a sealed box mini-monitor that is inherently reticent, but the Tyrs bring out a full, dynamic sound. the P3-ESRs, but there is something about @echoz - I have heard both the Ls5/5 and the Harbeth 40. Both work nice with a sub. 950 Euro | www. Januar 2020. I even had hair. Thanks . Am auffälligsten ist das Finish: Die AE-Version erfreut – ungewöhnlich für einen britischen Hersteller – mit einem angenehmen, äußerst The Graham/Chartwell LS3/5 are the best tiny speakers I've heard. 2 / Graham ls 5/9 / Harbeth superhl5 plus. they certainly have gone up in price though !! If you get a chance try and compare the much cheaper amphion The latest and possibly greatest within this illustrious line of LS3/5A inspired speakers is the Harbeth P3ESR XD. Go. I marginally prefer the Harbeth P3s over the Rogers, as I think they are smoother and have Here's one from my experience, and not on your list. I agree on the LS3/5a’s, which is why I specified the Graham Audio LS3/5 - this is based on the original version of the LS3/5 and is much mellower to my ear. It was pretty good with the P3ESR and Harbeth has made it better. hifitest. There is no way to listen to all models. I started this journey with a pair of Spendor s3/5’s to sample the British mini monitor sound. and whilst it has been successfully reborn by Harbeth, it The LS3/5A is a little near-field monitor, I'd just set it up for real close late night listening and enjoy it for what it is and what it does best. Ls3/5a inspired speakers: Harbeth P3ESR Spendor S3/5R2 KEF LS50 Falcon 15 ohm LS3/5a Stirling LS3/5a V2 Graham LS3/5 Graham LS3/5a It's getting a little crowded! PS: I own 4 of the above speakers and used to own one more. Harbeth have been making the P3ESR variation since 2012, but this ‘XD’ version moves the game on further still. Thread Mitten/Bass: 110 mm Harbeth; Daten auf der Harbeth-Homepage, abgerufen am 6. Would love to hear (or even hear about) a shoot out between s3/5R, HLP3ESR, Stirling V2 and the current Falcons. The ATC SCM7 is more comparable in size. Bare in mind I preferred them over the ProAc Tablette version at the time, I liked them just as much as the Harbeth P3ES-2 I had at the time, but they didn't rise to the standard of my Janine Elliot takes a listen to the Chartwell LS3/5 Loudspeakers by Graham Audio costing between £1650 and £1800. Die P3ESR XD spielt transparent und natürlich auf, kann es fein wie rockig und weiß auch leistungstechnisch absolut zu begeistern. The Harbeth P3ESR is Harbeth's take on the BBC LS 3/5a. hifinutt hifinutt. New posts. I can say the the GB crossover appear very well made. since each model within the same brand differ quite a bit with one another, I will just base this on their I now own the more costly Chartwell (Graham) LS6's, which are a bit larger than the LS3/5A-derived P3ESR's. A big fan of Moby. Donations . Members. The Harbeths have a tighter sound with a more strident I agree on the LS3/5a’s, which is why I specified the Graham Audio LS3/5 - this is based on the original version of the LS3/5 and is much mellower to my ear. They are wonderful speakers! Harbeth P3ESR 40th Anniversary. I'm a soundstage nut, hence my P3ESR XD könnte der Name einer Häckselmaschine oder eines „Star Wars“-Roboters sein. Yet there is still another serious contender that needs to be considered. To my ears, the Falcon LS3/5A had slightly more body and weight to the others, but still not a patch on the P3ESR. THE BEST ITERATION OF THE 'BBC MINI-MONITOR', BY FAR. Harbeth P3ESR XD Loudspeaker. What's new. If possible, find a pair of NHT Superzer 2. Paul Graham’s decision to base his entry to the LS3/5A market on the LS3/5 not only won the speaker a little differentiation from the competition, but has also brought back to life a little A speaker design from the 70's that STILL has a strong following! In todays video, I explore four LS3/5a-type speakers and discuss how they all compare and It's been ages since I've heard ls3/5a's. Use them in my MC240. Contrary to a couple of well-liked reviewers, I don't hear anything that approaches the overall quality and enjoyment to be had from the FA or Harbeth. I was scouring the used market,and I saw this pair of LS3/5’s. From a Harbeth owner no less! This could be the stuff of nightmares for Haywards Heath based company. The speakers feature a 110mm Harbeth bass/mid unit, with the diaphragm made of a special blend of injection moulded polypropylene (patented by Harbeth and referred to as RADIAL2). Thread starter Marty Lange; Start date Dec 29, 2018; Prev. I owned both the I've heard the Harbeths and I have Chartwell LS3/5As and you can't go wrong with either. To me, the latter just sound more There are some minor differences in high-frequency balance, with the new LS3/5 generally being slightly brighter than the old, but the LS3/5A magic is all present and correct, and of course by Die Harbeth P3ESR XD (2. As for The Falcon is an LS3/5a - the rest should be termed LS3/5a 'type' irrespective of how they perform and sound. I wouldn’t disagree re. Hence, I'm not The bidders for the purchase were the BBC lineup: Harbeth m30. Bemerkungen . I needed IB minis for I don't know how the Graham LS5/5 and Harbeth M40. 1 and on each occasion the customers have preferred and bought the Harbeth versions. Alan Shaw, Harbeth's president and chief engineer, says he's "not sure exactly when the last true, original LS3/5a was made by ourselves, Rogers, KEF, or Spendor, but the Harbeth P3 family is close to or has now actually outlasted the LS3/5a in continuous production through just three generations: P3, P3ES, P3ESR. Ist er aber nicht. In the interests of full disclosure I need to preface what you are about to read with a couple of facts about me. Stirling ls3/5a V2 vs Harbeth P3ESR. The Harbs have softened a little with running in. 3 Likes. Even the base Q7 I can say that the Graham LS6 is an outstanding speaker. I find my Stirling LS3/5a V2's warm and emotional - fab. The - Harbeth P3esr 40th Aniversary - Falcon Ls3/5a 2019 (On my market there are no much another options without bass reflex) My amplifiers are: - EAR 534, tubes, class A, 50W - However, they do have surprising bass weight, and while they share the BBC midrange clarity, (Shaw is an ex BBC guy and did all of the measurements for the The Harbeth is a better speaker by a bit. 140 of the 3/5. To my mind there are only three speakers on the planet that can be called an LS3/5A; the original If the Harbeth don’t sound much like my Quads then I am being much to limited by looking only at Harbeth. Room 19 the Graham Chartwell LS 3/5A is starting to grow on me. Also, the lack of attack is quite noticeable, especially if anyway, I've looked through some of your posts and you seem to be in a similar position as me when it comes to room size and speakers. I found them to be more similar than I have both Harbeth P3 ESRs and Rogers LS 3/5As (and Harbeth M30s). I have been through a lot of standmount speakers in my smallish room over the last few years, including Harbeth Flipping the cab back round into the LS3/5A aspect has given Spendor the opportunity to squeeze a slightly larger bass unit in, 150mm vs. I have listened to the SCM7 and One of these is of course the Graham Audio LS3/5. de) Here’s the top darling, the relatively inexpensive Harbeth Audio P3ESR XD Loudspeaker ($3290/pair in cherry); add $200 for Walnut, Olive Ash and Rosewood (see lead Rogers LS5/9 ClassicHarbeth Monitor 30. I owned both the P3ESR and Graham LS3/5 - the Graham is my favorite of Harbeth P3ESR XD (Paar) Der Nachfolger für die legendäre Harbeth BBC LS3/5a Vor die Aufgabe gestellt, einen Nachfolger für die legendäre Harbeth BBC LS3/5a zu kreieren, ist es Alan Shaw, dem Chef-Entwickler von Harbeth in 4-jähriger Entwicklungsarbeit gelungen, einen Lautsprecher zu bauen, dessen Klangvolumen für seine kompakten Abmessungen (in etwa Harbeth P3ESR are the smallest speakers in their range and they are the successor to the legendary BBC LS3/5A, of which Harbeth had been a licensee. The Falcons sound a bit thin and small in comparison to the Harbeths. My Harbeth P3ESR's are more neutral transparent tighter with a harsher treble - more 'hi fi' if you like. I have both the Falcon LS3/5a gold badge and the Harbeth P3ESR. Vorige Generationen: P3, P3ES, P3ES-2; wird als moderne Version der LS3/5A gesehen (Grundkonstruktion, Mitten-/Basschassis- und Gehäusegröße). Menu Log in Register advertisement. Jul 31, 2022 #2 I loved the p3esr and follow the comments . sberger Hard Core Geezer. I grabbed them,and never looked back. To me, they're the logical choice. These little guys have a wonderful sound if you don't need real bass output. But we each have our I need your advice in selecting acoustics. I prefer the Stirlings - many/most people seem to prefer the P3 ESR's. I really like the nimble, detailed and detailed midrange, the imaging and that the The Harbeth Monitor 30 as best as I can tell is Harbeth's version of the BBC LS 5/9. Realistic & Tuneful Bass Now this is the most obvious improvement with the XD. The rests include Spendor (A1, Classic 3/4, Classic 4/5), Proac (Tablette 10, Tablette 10 Signature, DB3), Dali Menuet SE, Monitor Audio Gold 100, Dynaudio (Emit 10, Evoke 10), Sonus Faber Lumina 2, Neat Acoustics Ministra, Elac (BS 312, BS 403), Magnepan LRS (ok this is not that small), P3ESr's undoubtedly will image and disappear far more effectively in such a set-up (LS3 variants are known for this exact quality, a bigger box in such a set-up will be less effective at this), and their wall proximity should give you some in room response below that of specs. 16 No. Current visitors. Berichte . Subscriber. Log in Register. Harbeth’s development team But I won’t use ‘amazing’. Next slide. de 11/2009, Der Profi, abgerufen am 7. audio. In addition to being able to play Led Zeppelin II without distress, I can certainly recommend the Graham LS3/5. I listen mostly to pop, jazz, a bit of ambient. Which of the The ATC SCM11, and especially the SCM19, are considerably larger than the LS3/5a designs. I was floored! My next purchase was going to be Harbeth p3esr. I was able to do a side by side comparison. I have had the Harbeth P3ESR, 30. I’ve also read that the Harbeth is harder to drive than the ProAc, which may be something to think about. The only one of those I I own a pair of Graham Chartwell LS3/5’s, and prior to those had a pair of Spendor S3/5’s. My room is relative small 3,155m by 4,49m (14sqm) and I'm sitting 1,7m away so close to near field conditions. But the Spendors are still very good, especially in a smaller room. Imitation is often a high compliment, but don't be persuaded that the SA speakers are just a less expensive FA or Harbeth P3ESR or Graham LS3/5A. Not a B110, not a T27, so not an LS3/5A IMHO. No secrets - the Falcon is my favourite. 1; 2; First Prev 2 of 2 Go to page. You can hear deeper into the recording than with every Harbeth I have owned in the past. 2 stack up on matching peak output level to bass extension. 3 and in my opinion the Harbeth's don't project as uniformly as well as the Ls5/5 doesalso I prefer my music a bit louder, while the ATC SCM50 SL handle more power I feel they are also better suited for orchestra and electronic music which is a bit more detail oriented. Nov 5, 2022 #22 SaSi said: Not to bash the KEF110/T27 combination Die Harbeth P3ESR XD schreibt die HiFi-Geschichte weiter. It was developed prior to the Rogers JR-149 vs. The bidders for the purchase were the BBC lineup: Harbeth m30. inputaudio. " The original P3 was designed by Shaw to I'm currently listening to a pair of Graham Chartwell LS 3/5A but I'm curious how the other speakers LS6 and LS 5/9 will sound and if they are significantly better. What about the Harbeth P3 ESR v the KEF LS50 Metas? With a miniature box speaker like my reference Falcon Gold Badge LS3/5as or the similarly sized Harbeth P3ESR XDs, which I'm auditioning this month, I have to sit very close to experience any of their direct, "off-the-cone" energy. März 2020. However, if you want to reproduce good bass then ISTM Harbeth P3ESR (everyone agrees these are great, but I'm hoping one of the others will be 2/3rds as great for a fraction of the outlay) The Graham/Chartwell LS3/5 are the best John Atkinson's review of the Harbeth version of the BBC LS3/5a appeared in the December 1993 Stereophile (Vol. Room 19 square meters, amplification Yamaha 2000. 12): The Rogers version of the BBC -designed LS3/5a appeared in Wasn't it just. Amazing space-saving sound. The MS88 is not Rogers LS3/5A ClassicHarbeth P3esr XDSystemNAT AUDIO Single HPSAudio GD R1Tellurium Q The 2 standouts for me are Harbeth P3ESR-XD and Rogers LS 3/5a. It sort of sounds like you already have your heart set on Harbeth, but I'm gonna throw out a suggestion anyway: the Stirling Broadcast LS3/6. I've done several demos of the various modern incarnations of the LS3/5a against the Harbeth P3ESR and not a single customer could find anything they did which could equal I've got the Stirling V2's and have heard the P3ESR at shows. In acoustics, I appreciate the ability to convey the realism of vocals and voices. I have listened to the SCM7 and The two LS3/5 models may share most of the type nomenclature but they have differently-built enclosures, different panel thickness, grill-attachment methods, crossover The ATC SCM11, and especially the SCM19, are considerably larger than the LS3/5a designs. Harbeth P3ESR. 1 and 30. Bandit August 13, 2022, 8:31am 9. Also, I can’t position them as far from the wall as is recommended. It has soft material tweeters, which may be more to your liking. Or do I just go all out and buy brand new I have done direct A/B demonstrations of the LS3/5A v P3ESR and LS5/9 v M30. This speaker is of similar size and design to the SHL5 - with cabinets made in the Spendor factory - as are those of the SHL5s. discussion. AmadeusMozart Well-Known Member. Oct 6, 2022 #21 Yes on the 7027's. First, as you can see in my bio on this website, I am a Harbeth owner, and have been since 2014. Using its exclusive RADIAL2 cone technology, the sound is more transparent and faster-paced than ever, with a A well-balanced review and comparison of the bargain priced Sound Artist LS3/5 v Harbeth P3ESR. 1s. Uh A pair of Rogers LS3/5A for around 1300-1400 (I don’t have a specific pair in mind but can likely find something around this price). Der Nach-Nachfolger der legendären BBC LS3/5a gehört auf die „Muss-ich-irgendwann-besitzen“-Wunschliste vieler eingefleischter Musikfans. ProAc DB1 vs. The blurriness of the SA was starting to become noticeable by the I can recommend the Schiit Tyr monoblocks, which pair great with my Harbeth P3ESR-XDs. I’ve owned harbeth p3esr, m30. Second HH’s So, my experience is very similar. 2, and the Graham LS5/9 and LS6, as well as the Spendor 3/5. The Harbeth HL-5 is Harbeth's version of the BBC LS 3/6. 2 40thGraham 5/9 I'll say one other thing - I have heard the Graham L5/9 on a number of occasions (but never owned a pair) on a variety of systems, and I think it is the finest small speaker I had As far as I’m aware the LS3/5A isn’t even a current BBC spec anyway, they moved over to active Dynaudios etc decades ago, so really they are just selling licensing without any Modern reiteration of these speaker, Harbeth P3ESR, do much better job at fooling you that you are listening to much bigger speakers. That has a They are the same size as the LS3/5A but are designed to be used close to the wall. Graham LS3/5, which is better? (Read 3390 times) (Read 3390 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. The Harbeth Monitor 40 is Harbeth's version of the BBC LS 5/8. If my listening position gets too far away or the speakers are positioned too far apart or too far from the wall behind them, the sound thins . Die Harbeth P3ESR XD (2. Forums. They are more sensitive or make bigger differences between records, yes even songs. My main loudspeakers are Harbeth Super HL5+ 40th Anniversary editions and I also own a pair of Obviously it goes into Falcon Gold Badge price territory (and the Graham LS3/5 are cheaper again). If I wanted something bigger, fuller I've done several demos of the various modern incarnations of the LS3/5a against the Harbeth P3ESR and not a single customer could find anything they did which could equal the Harbeths. Previous slide. Tue, 09/10/2018. You are welcome to listen to my LS3/5As if you get to Orange County, CA. de) machen nicht alles kurz und klein, glänzen nicht golden und kommen auch nicht aus der Zukunft. Und sie hat Author Topic: Harbeth P3ESR XD vs. I'd describe the V2's as rich sounding with superb imaging. The Harbeth speakers, even the C7 XD which was very clean and open, all add some warmth to the record. You’ll see in Bandit’s photo the ideal position for the Harbeth, well away from the wall. 1, graham ls6 and falcon ls3/5a. Mine are 9cm from the wall.